Showing posts with label Banking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Banking. Show all posts

Monday, 19 March 2012

Online banking: Is your money safe from hackers?

By Marcie Geffner | Bankrate.com
When you log in to your online banking account, you presumably know that you are yourself. But how does your bank know you're you and not an unauthorized family member, friend or hacker trying to gain access to your account?
The answer involves something called authentication technology, or methods to identify a computer's user, and it's about to get more sophisticated thanks to new federal guidelines that require banks to be more diligent about their online banking security.
Most of the changes will happen behind the scenes, but bank customers might notice a few tweaks as well, according to Cary Whaley, vice president of payment and technology policy at Independent Community Bankers of America, a banking industry group in Washington, D.C.
"Consumers have to be sensitive, and I think they are, to the fact that banks are extremely concerned with making sure it's them doing the transaction and not somebody else," he says.

Real risk

The new guidelines for banks were issued in June 2011 as a supplement to regulations originally promulgated seven years ago by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, or FFIEC, an interagency group that prescribes uniform principals, standards and reports for federal bank examiners.
According to "Supplement to Authentication in an Internet Banking Environment," a FFIEC document, the new guidelines include the following.
  • Reinforce expectations that financial institutions should perform periodic risk assessments.
  • Identify controls that are now less effective, given that the online banking environment has become more "hostile," to use the FFIEC's description.
  • Identify minimum elements that should be part of banks' consumer awareness and education efforts about banking online.
The risks of online banking fraud are real. More people are using these services. And more online fraudsters are using more sophisticated, effective and malicious methods to perpetrate their crimes, the FFIEC says. Organized criminal groups have been identified as well, and some now specialize in financial fraud, using kits of automated "attack tools" that can be downloaded from the Internet.
Banks that make substantive changes to their security protocols may send new terms to their customers, Whaley says.
That will create opportunities for both customer education and fraud, the FDIC says. The concern arises because scammers took advantage of the original guidance issued in 2005 to try to trick bank customers into "enrolling" in new security measures.

Simple isn't sufficient

Banks have used simple identification technologies, such as usernames, passwords and computer cookies (small files that websites store on users' computers for identification purposes), for many years. But now more sophisticated techniques are expected to be employed for banking online, Whaley says.
"Simple authentication -- a password and username -- is just not sufficient enough to protect," Whaley says. "That's a good starting point, but you need more."
Among other possibilities, the newer techniques are likely to include the following.
  • Complex device identification such as PC configuration (how a computer is set up), Internet Protocol, or IP, address (a unique number that identifies each computer connected to the Internet) or geolocation (the identification of a device's physical whereabouts in the real world).
  • Challenge questions for which the answers can't easily be found online through Google or social media.
  • Nonsensical questions designed to confuse anyone other than the authorized user.

Consumer tips

Implementation of enhanced controls should make online banking more secure, according to Greg Hernandez, a spokesman for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. in Washington, D.C.
Still, Hernandez says most unauthorized bank account access occurs not as a result of a weakness in the bank's security system but due to malware, or malicious software, installed on the consumer's computer.
That means consumers shouldn't rely solely on the bank's technology but also be vigilant on their own when banking online to ward off financial cyber crimes.
"The most important thing consumers can do to protect themselves is to practice safe computing at home," Hernandez says. "They should use a firewall and anti-virus/anti-malware software and keep it updated. They should be on the lookout for suspicious emails and avoid suspicious websites. They should not click on links contained in suspicious emails or download software from questionable sources."

Wednesday, 14 March 2012

Goldman Banker Quits In Disgust, Blasts Firm For “Ripping Off” Clients


By Henry Blodget | Daily Ticker 

Another PR disaster is unfolding for Goldman Sachs (GS), the Wall Street investment bank that has already borne the brunt of popular wrath in the aftermath of the financial crisis.
A senior executive at the firm, Greg Smith, quit today in spectacular fashion, announcing his resignation in a scathing New York Times editorial in which he accused the firm of gleefully "ripping off" its clients and succumbing to short-term greed.
Within today's Goldman Sachs, Smith says, senior bankers often refer to the firm's clients as "muppets."
The firm has lost the culture of integrity, teamwork, and humility that once made it great, Smith says, and instead has become a place that is "as toxic and destructive as I have ever seen it."
"It makes me ill how callously people [in the firm] talk about ripping their clients off," Smith continues... "Leadership [at the firm] used to be about ideas, setting an example, and doing the right thing. Today, if you make enough money for the firm (and are not currently an ax murderer) you will be promoted into a position of influence."
To say this is a devastating indictment of Goldman is an understatement. Outside observers have been saying similar things about the firm for years, but Goldman's response has been that it always puts its clients first and that outsiders--including Congress-people--just don't understand its business.
But now an insider has said the same thing.
And it seems to verify every criticism that has been lobbed at Goldman over the past several years.
When I worked on Wall Street in the 1990s, Goldman Sachs had a pristine reputation. The firm certainly wasn't "humble," by any means, and then, as ever, rainmakers generally did well. But Goldman also wasn't as venal and callous as the firm Smith describes today. And in those days, it would have been inconceivable to think that a departing Goldman executive would write a public screed like this.
Smith hopes that his editorial will serve as a wake-up call for Goldman's Board of Directors, which itself was tarred by a disgraceful insider-trading scandal last year. Assuming the reality is as Smith describes it, Goldman employees and shareholders would do well to take a long, hard look in the mirror.
(Meanwhile, a former aide of Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner has just joined Goldman Sachs as the head of global communications. He's certainly going to have a busy first day!)