About.com Health's Disease and Condition content is reviewed by the Medical Review Board
It’s important to distinguish the relatively new idea or production of explicitly feminist pornography from the slightly older, and much more thoroughly documented discourse of feminist responses to pornography. Feminists making pornography and calling it feminist is a very different topic than feminists talking about pornography other people have made.
Here are a few criteria people making and writing about feminist porn have suggested for what makes pornography feminist:
A Brief History of Feminist Pornography and Pornographers
- there is a focus on female pleasure
- the material is primarily (or solely) made by women
- the material has a mission, its primary goal is not to arouse, but to engage on a political level
- the content is made by someone who self-identifies as feminist
- there is a conscious effort to challenge traditional gender and sexual roles and stereotypes in the dialogue and action
- the production is “ethical” and considers the safety and dignity of the performers
- material that is as much about representation of identity and pleasure of the people in the production as it is about getting the viewer off.
Whether you’re satisfied with some or all of those criteria, and whether you’re even willing to accept the idea that there can be feminist pornography depends largely on how you feel about porn, feminism, and an individual’s right to name things for themselves.
A Brief History of Feminist Pornography and Pornographers
If we accept that feminist porn is any explicit sexual imagery made by someone who identifies as feminist, the history of feminist porn is much older than even the history of the moving image. For this article however I’m going to focus on contemporary feminist porn that is most often traced back to the early 1980s.
In 1983 a group of politicized women working in the sex industry, mostly in mainstream porn, formed a support group they called Club 90. The following year they were approached to participate in a public art performance for which they created a show called “Deep Inside Porn Stars” meant to address in part the question of what is feminist pornography (you can read more about this in Annie Sprinkle's excellent book, Post-Porn Modernist).
The participants in that performance are among the first women to talk explicitly about being feminists and making pornography. They include Annie Sprinkle, Candida Royalle, Gloria Leonard, Veronica Hart, Susie Nero, Kellie Nichols, and Veronica Vera. While she wasn’t in this group, Nina Hartley is another actor of this generation who has long identified as a feminist and a pornographer. Until recently most of Hartley’s work was in front of the camera. Her work raises interesting questions about whether or not feminist porn requires a feminist behind the camera, in front, or both.
The next major event in feminist porn happened the same year, when Candida Royalle created Femme Productions, the first explicitly feminist porn production company. Royalle gave herself the task of focusing on female pleasure and eliminating the elements of mainstream pornography she found least interesting to women; namely prolonged close-up shots of genitals and the external male ejaculation shot (the "money shot"). Royalle began with little funding or support and her company became wildly successful. From a business perspective she is largely responsible for changing the face of the mainstream industry as her success proved to other producers that targeting women, and creating content that looked different could actually work. From a feminist porn theory perspective her work offers the most unified vision from one producer and is a fascinating body from which we can talk about whether what "women like" can or should be directly equated with what is feminist.
In 1983 a group of politicized women working in the sex industry, mostly in mainstream porn, formed a support group they called Club 90. The following year they were approached to participate in a public art performance for which they created a show called “Deep Inside Porn Stars” meant to address in part the question of what is feminist pornography (you can read more about this in Annie Sprinkle's excellent book, Post-Porn Modernist).
The participants in that performance are among the first women to talk explicitly about being feminists and making pornography. They include Annie Sprinkle, Candida Royalle, Gloria Leonard, Veronica Hart, Susie Nero, Kellie Nichols, and Veronica Vera. While she wasn’t in this group, Nina Hartley is another actor of this generation who has long identified as a feminist and a pornographer. Until recently most of Hartley’s work was in front of the camera. Her work raises interesting questions about whether or not feminist porn requires a feminist behind the camera, in front, or both.
The next major event in feminist porn happened the same year, when Candida Royalle created Femme Productions, the first explicitly feminist porn production company. Royalle gave herself the task of focusing on female pleasure and eliminating the elements of mainstream pornography she found least interesting to women; namely prolonged close-up shots of genitals and the external male ejaculation shot (the "money shot"). Royalle began with little funding or support and her company became wildly successful. From a business perspective she is largely responsible for changing the face of the mainstream industry as her success proved to other producers that targeting women, and creating content that looked different could actually work. From a feminist porn theory perspective her work offers the most unified vision from one producer and is a fascinating body from which we can talk about whether what "women like" can or should be directly equated with what is feminist.
feminist porn hits the web
In that same year the magazine On Our Backs began publishing under the banner "Entertainment for the Adventurous Lesbian." As with Clube 90, many of those involved in the creation and production of On Our Backs became outspoken feminist pornographers. Some, like Susie Bright, stuck mostly to print. Others, like the two founders Nan Kinney and Deborah Sundahl went on to produce films.
There are interesting links to be made between the development of feminist porn and the development of what gets called "authentic" lesbian pornography. While mainstream porn had always included so called "girl/girl" scenes these scenes were intended to represent a male fantasy. When magazines like On Our Backs and Bad Attitude and later the lesbian porn production company Fatale Media came on the scene porn consumers for the first time were able to see material made by women who were doing in bed what they were representing on film. Today porn that is identified as feminist represents all kinds of sexualities, and it could be argued that a more fluid approach to sexual orientation in porn is another characteristic of feminist pornography.
In the late 1980s and 1990s the flourishing of 'zine culture and then the introduction of easy to produce websites contributed to a radical shift in representations of sexually explicit imagery. Suddenly the means of production were available to many, and the kinds of print and video pornography being produced reflected a diversity that hadn’t been seen before. Some of this content was self-identified as feminist, much of it wasn’t, but what it all reflected was a focus away from representing desire of a faceless, nameless heterosexual male audience, and toward representing desire as personally experienced by those doing the representing.
It’s this theme of representation that may best tie together the newest group of pornographers who identify, or are identified as, feminist. Pornographers including Tristan Taormino, Shine Louise Houston, Buck Angel, and many others are all creating pornography that is diverse in its content and production, but all has one thing in common; a desire to represent something genuine about people being sexual and about sexual pleasure.
In that same year the magazine On Our Backs began publishing under the banner "Entertainment for the Adventurous Lesbian." As with Clube 90, many of those involved in the creation and production of On Our Backs became outspoken feminist pornographers. Some, like Susie Bright, stuck mostly to print. Others, like the two founders Nan Kinney and Deborah Sundahl went on to produce films.
There are interesting links to be made between the development of feminist porn and the development of what gets called "authentic" lesbian pornography. While mainstream porn had always included so called "girl/girl" scenes these scenes were intended to represent a male fantasy. When magazines like On Our Backs and Bad Attitude and later the lesbian porn production company Fatale Media came on the scene porn consumers for the first time were able to see material made by women who were doing in bed what they were representing on film. Today porn that is identified as feminist represents all kinds of sexualities, and it could be argued that a more fluid approach to sexual orientation in porn is another characteristic of feminist pornography.
In the late 1980s and 1990s the flourishing of 'zine culture and then the introduction of easy to produce websites contributed to a radical shift in representations of sexually explicit imagery. Suddenly the means of production were available to many, and the kinds of print and video pornography being produced reflected a diversity that hadn’t been seen before. Some of this content was self-identified as feminist, much of it wasn’t, but what it all reflected was a focus away from representing desire of a faceless, nameless heterosexual male audience, and toward representing desire as personally experienced by those doing the representing.
It’s this theme of representation that may best tie together the newest group of pornographers who identify, or are identified as, feminist. Pornographers including Tristan Taormino, Shine Louise Houston, Buck Angel, and many others are all creating pornography that is diverse in its content and production, but all has one thing in common; a desire to represent something genuine about people being sexual and about sexual pleasure.
No comments:
Post a Comment